Selected work

Research & Projects

Questions from linguistics and cognitive science, turned into controlled experiments on language models: how moral framing changes a model’s dilemma choices, which properties change when a noun is modified, and, on the human side, how children come to tell possibility from necessity. Writing samples, course projects and earlier studies with people sit alongside them.

Research

Questions from linguistics and cognitive science: the human evidence they start from, and controlled experiments on language models, behaviour first, then inside the model.

  1. Mechanistic interpretability

    Project · 2026–27 · supervised at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) · manuscript in preparation

    Moral framing and dilemma choices in language models

    When moral wording changes a model’s choice, what changes: the weighing of outcomes, a tendency to answer with action, or some other process? And how far can internal interventions tell these apart?

    A trolley heads along the main track toward one person; a lever at the junction would send it onto a side track with three people. A box with the slogan Prioritize the greater good points to the lever: pulling it becomes more likely even though it costs more lives, which is not what a utilitarian would pick.
  2. Behaviour and interpretability

    Project · independent · manuscript in preparation

    Which properties change when a noun is modified?

    When a modifier adds a feature, as in a winged dog, which property answers shift in language models: those that depend on it, those that merely co-occur with it, or those associated with the word?

    Schematic of the measure: the prompt It was a winged dog. Question: Can it fly?, scored as log P(Yes) minus log P(No); on a score axis, a winged dog is compared with an old dog (common modifiers, DiD) and with an aquatic dog (cross-group control, DiD×).
  3. Vagueness · controlled training

    Project · independent · preprint 2026

    Can vague words teach a scale?

    Speakers disagree about where tall ends. For a learner that sees only text, is that disagreement noise, or evidence about the scale underneath?

    Figures ordered by height under the words short, average and tall; one figure near the tall/average boundary is called tall by one speaker and average by two others.
  4. Modality · human side

    Project · master’s thesis · in planning, no data yet

    Modal language in preschool children

    How do preschool children come to tell possibility from necessity? The study lays the groundwork for later work on modal language in language models.

Writing

Analyses written up on their own; used as writing samples.

  1. Typicality

    Writing sample · working paper 2026 · lingbuzz/010343

    Typicality in referent choice: what the description leaves open

    Separates three conditions under which a description meets two candidates that differ in typicality, and what a forced choice between them can and cannot show.

  2. Modality

    Writing sample · in development

    Three Ways of Leaving p Unsettled

    Compares answers that leave a question open, such as might p and I don’t know whether p, by the replies and continuations each one licenses.

Course projects

  1. Model training · image CNN

    Project · team course project 2026 · report 2026

    Training choices in a small CNN for street-view country classification

    Training choices alone took a fixed 1.69M-parameter network from 0.62 to 0.82 validation accuracy; the best dropout rate depended on training length.

  2. EEG experiment

    Project · course study, Winter 2026–27 · planned

    A group EEG study in Cognitive Neuroscience

    A guided group study covering preregistration, EEG recording, and preprocessing and analysis in MNE-Python.

Earlier research experience

A course evaluation of vision–language models, a master’s course experiment with people, and an undergraduate reading assessment.

  1. Model evaluation

    Project · course paper 2026 · single author

    Cross-lingual prototypicality bias in multimodal evaluation metrics and VLM judges

    With each image pair held fixed and only the prompt language changed, both VLM judges changed their answer on about 70% of items in at least one of seven languages.

    Original ProtoBias benchmark pair: a futon on a gray carpet beside a bed on a beige carpet. Both images are original dataset stimuli.
  2. Behavioural experiment

    Course experiment · Winter 2025–26 · report and poster

    Taking a language model’s word for it?

    Participants answered ten general-knowledge questions and could check each answer, first with ChatGPT or Wikipedia (assigned at random), then with the other source. Starting with ChatGPT did not reduce double-checking (N = 47). Designed in a group of three and run by the whole class; I did the analysis and wrote the report and poster.

    Mean number of questions checked (of 10) with standard deviations, by round and source order. Wikipedia first: 6.24 then 5.38. ChatGPT first: 5.78 then 7.00. The lines cross; neither difference was reliable.
  3. Child reading assessment

    Undergraduate project · September–December 2021

    Reading difficulties in primary-school children

    How does presenting a Chinese character alone or within a word change access to its pronunciation? A project report on reading assessment, with qualitative observations and character–word examples.

    Illustrative Chinese character–word pairs: 龄/年龄 and 筑/建筑, with the target character highlighted.